By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 09 November 2013
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:
Mr Puggsly said:


If they feel it provides them $60 of entertainment, what's the problem?

Are you in a 3rd world country? Is $60 annuallty a lot of money to you?

Yes I'm, and no it's not... even tough why pay yearly for the same content??? I have 120 PS3 games and no yearly franchise on it have more than 1 game (1 fifa, 1 pes is all I have of yearly franchise)... If you like to pay 60 for the same game multiple times be my guest, maybe you're just to rich...

 

You own 120 PS3 games... yet you think people who bought every CoD are rich?

Simply... brilliant.

Are you impaired? You asked if 60 is to much and said no... but to pay 60 every year for the same game is insane (and there are some folks that just play this, so in Xbox360 in 7 years of CoD the person would have expended 14*60=840 dollars, and that is a lot).

And I'm assuming that you may be rich if for you its just a small exchange.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."