By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r said:
Jereel Hunter said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
Jereel Hunter said:
Why are console sales the only thing they factor in? They're acting as if the 360 hasn't moved something in the realm of 100m more software units than the PS3. Not to mention the fact that they generate more online revenue. If console sales are all that matter, Nintendo won the generation, hands down. If we're talking about reputation, market penetration, profit, etc, it's a different story.

Also, wars are relative. Entering the generation, Sony entered the war with 2/3 of all territory(market share), and MS and Nintendo split the rest. Sony ends the war in worse financial shape and with 1/3 or so of the market share. If you exit a war with half the land you had to start, regardless of who won, you lost.


If youre castle was attacked long before your army was ready and you still manage to kick the enemies ass, you won.

Repelling your enemy at your castle means they're still holding all your lands. Your definition of victory isn't very accurate.

launching an early attack and still losing (360) and running away from the war before its finished (wii) isnt in my definition of victory either.

Sony have won, even if I have just to count that them wining my support all over again.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."