By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chris Hu said:
Too_Talls said:
Chris Hu said:
Wow further proof that NBA Live is a half assed effort and will bomb its only 9GB compared to 2K14's beefy 43GB.


This is like saying xbox 1 is better than ps4 because it's 100 dollars more. I'd waight to see what they offer. 2k's focus was obviously the graphics, while the gameplay probably stays the same. Live could still end up more entertaining.


Not only will 2K14 look a lot better it will offer a lot more features it will easily end up with a much higher final metascore.  Also the last time Live was the most entertaining basketball game was before 2K made its lauch on the Dreamcast.

Going off track history, I would give the nod to 2k14. but my point is I wouldnt judge a game by it's gigs. what if live was 43 gigs and 2k was 9? what would your thought process be then?



http://imageshack.com/a/img801/6426/f7pc.gif

^Yes that's me ripping it up in the GIF. :)