By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eyeofcore on 08 November 2013
Edit Thread
fatslob-:O said:
eyeofcore said:


My knowledge of English is fine, only speaking has some issues since I don't speak much in English since it is not my native language and claiming that I am contradicting and that I am naive is a fallacy. I may not explain properly what I am trying to say so Il try again to prove your ignorance and people at Anandtech would agree with me and Pemalite did not pwned me, but himself with that post and his own ignorance.

Just because I don't do programming does not mean I can't understand the concept of it.

hUMA has the effect and you are denying it, first of all hUMA has less bottlenecks thus it increases the speed of accessing data thus better communication between CPU and GPU also you can do that in GPGPU yet again some things need to be done on CPU and hUMA allows far more direct communication between CPU and GPU to allow real time processing and showcase of those results thus it is way more correct.

All of things that Microsoft said about Kinect in Xbox One were made possible by hUMA and AMD's slide also indicate that because hUMA rapidly increases execution of tasks and makes programming easier between CPU and GPU, thus you have Bolt and also detecting problems in the code in Open CL should be easier, right?

Just because I can not explain you sometimes properly and just because  you can't think out of the box for a second thus not being narrow minded as a person.

Anyway... I wonder if developers will offload pathfinding to hUMA, it should drastically increase challenges in game eg flanking and that, I am still amazed with original Half Life's AI that flanks me compared to other AI's that mostly just charge like suicide bombers.

@Bold Bwahahahaha. I hope you don't stay too long in their forums cause they probably already getting tired of your lies. 

If you don't do any programming you will fail to understand pemalite's and my perspective of things. 

That second line is epic fail LOL. It shows that you have no understanding of how hUMA truly works!

Kinect was possible without hUMA! Apparently you don't understand what I had meant by massively parallel. 

Your the narrow minded person here! You cannot even get your facts right which suggest you have some seroius issues of understanding anything that happens in the world of complex circuits! 


Yet I don't lie, that is the problem... Just because I don't do any programming that does not mean that I and others can not understand your perspective, I do HTML and that is programming because scripting is also programming in a way, so I can see your point of view also that second line is not a epic fail as you hope so because that is simplified representation of hUMA. Normally it goes something like(the way I see it);

CPU>Cache>System RAM<VRAM/Cache<GPU UMA

CPU>Cache<>VRAM/Cache<GPU hUMA

Your a funny, I did not say Kinect is impossible with hUMA, I said that CERTAIN features to be real time need GPGPU or more better and efficient hUMA that simplifies ways of handling CPU and GPU communication. I may not explain it weel, at least I get the picture while you are blind to see that I get the picture that you are getting just in mere words while at least I can in my thought visualize it while you can't!

You need to stop with your hope of me being a narrow minded person, English is not my primary language so I may not explain to you perfectly yet you claim something that makes you look foolish since anyone can understand with some research, don't deny it...