Mr Khan said:
The key is not "what" but "why". In the case of the servicewoman you're speaking of, were they truly doing it of their own volition (i'm not saying that's not possible. It's more than likely that it was their idea, since weaker-willed women are less likely to go to the service in the first place), or are they doing it to look sexy for the men, or due to peer pressure from the servicemen? |
Of course they are on their own volition. In fact many of them were subject to UCMJ actions for conduct unbecoming, violating general orders etc.
Appearing in that manner if by force is a different subject all together and is a crime. I was discussing known, self-motivated actions by culpable and coherent adults.
Though that brings up a point in my mind that the sexist moniker could/should be reserved for those who DO resort to criminal behavior to force sexualization/degredation onto someone. sexist = rapist, sexist =/= artist.