By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
fatslob-:O said:
Ashadian said:
DJEVOLVE said:
This tells me they have a learning curve. Xbox One can easily achieve 1080p 60 FPS.

Maybe you should read this article:

http://www.redgamingtech.com/xbox-one-esram-720p-why-its-causing-a-resolution-bottleneck-analysis/

It might shed some light on the issue for you!

The gap with PS4 will remain as the GPU will always be weaker!

No amount of clouds will change that!

The real issue is X1's lack of rops and bandwidth. In all honesty I don't see what's so special about the esram. The eDRAM in the xbox 360 only gave free antialiasing. With a small amount of memory 32mb isn't meaningful enough to do any sort of big task. 

I'm pretty sure, developers could employ a form of tile based rendering to get around that 32Mb limit. :)

Dude, tiled rendering as existed for like ages LOL. It existed like back to the dreamcast days or so ? I honestly think it doesn't matter much anymore because we have systems that go over 4gb+ ram. The only thing I can see the esram being used for is to save some bandwidth through a tiled deferred rendering method. The reason tiled rendering existed in the first place had to do with hardware having pretty limited vram in the first place. Remember those days where graphics cards used to have 64 mb ?