My Battlefield 4 campaign review...

[fatslob-:O]

Ponyless said:

fatslob-:O said:

Ponyless said:
It was a strawman. Curl-6 argued that sales do not equal quality. Instead of you offering anything against, that you took it as him arguing that higher sales= lower quality. He never argued that but you took it as that since you have no idea how to argue against his real point. Also that entire second sentence is completely irrelevant because i don't care for which is right, i just noticed you made a dumb remark and i wanted to point it out. Also are you gonna try to shit up this topic like you did with the "ask a dev anything" thread?

Apparently your not reading again. I never once argued that. I argued that a game with higher sales is better. Your lack of reading comprehension is showing. *Facepalm*

The real question here is are you going to shit on some over the internet ? 

Gee I wonder what's dumb about that remark ? I guess all 28 million people who purchased wii play lied to themselves LMAO. /extreme sarcasm

If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL.

That's exactly what you did, trying to warp curl-6 points that higher sales= lower quality. Think whatever you think, seeing as how you derail every thread you're in, it's a waste trying to talk to you. (Remember, this was a battlefield 4 review and you changed it to a sales=quality thread)

That was an example. he argued sales =/= quality and I did the opposite. Your over analyzing something that's supposed to be pretty trivial in comparison to actual point at hand. LOL you take this internet shit too seriously. If derailment means more entertainment I'm in, you can have more boring threads.