By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ponyless on 03 November 2013
Edit Thread
fatslob-:O said:
Ponyless said:
fatslob-:O said:
If sales did not equate to quality then I guess the Wii was an awful system while the virtual boy was the best thing since buttered toast LOL. I guess mario games are less than everything. (It's like malstrom said, people who do not use the business gavel so they will fail to get why something is successful in the first place.) Like it or not sales DOES equate to quality otherwise some publisher would stop funding it. That is why call of duty remains as the top franchise this generation compared to everything else. Call of duty is gold while conduit remains in brown stain.

 

What a massive straw man of a post you just made.

Nothing was exactly strawman. You just proved malstrom even further as to why gamers do not talk about game business. If anything the people with gaming stigma just proves malstroms point how overly infatuated they are with the idea of quality instead of actually looking at the real numbers.

It was a strawman. Curl-6 argued that sales do not equal quality. Instead of you offering anything against, that you took it as him arguing that higher sales= lower quality. He never argued that but you took it as that since you have no idea how to argue against his real point. Also that entire second sentence is completely irrelevant because i don't care for which is right, i just noticed you made a dumb remark and i wanted to point it out. Also are you gonna try to shit up this topic like you did with the "ask a dev anything" thread?