blkfish92 said:
iamdeath said:
Kane1389 said:
iamdeath said:
Kane1389 said:
No one could possibly make an objective argument as to why Demon's Souls is any way, shape or form better than Dark Souls.
No one. |
Umm no, flat wrong. PVP alone was way better as were bosses. Only thing dark had was more open world................. PVP was a major part of the souls games.
|
No poise system, completely broken lagstabing structure, constantly popping grass, unescapable stunlocking, you cant invade while in human form, no covenants(thus its a very straighr foward simple repetitive pvp structure ''kill the host, get your body back, die on purpose, repeat...)
|
Now you just making up stuff. Combat was identical. What different tactics were then in dark that weren't in demons? Graphics are identical in both.
Lagstabing?? What are you even talking about? Popping grass?? YEah cannot take you seriously.
Unescapable stunlocking??? What?
Can't invade in human form? Did you even play demons souls? Flat lies. You HAVE to be i human form.
Demons had world tendency, better PVP, better bosses.
|
Sorry for the double post, but I just noticed this.
I can't take you seriously and neither should anyone else who played the Souls games as extensively or more than I have. I bolded what I found that you put to be false information or your opinion which you forgot to mention is subjective. I've got hundreds upon hundreds of hours dumped into both games, I know all strategies both games offer for pve and pvp, what you're saying is complete madness and should be disregarded by everyone.
Edit: I've seen enough in this thread..no point guys lol
|
So do I, and if you go to the Sousl forum and say dark souls had better PVP they will laugh you off the forum, heck even the DEVELOP said they were sorry for the PVP in dark soulks...why is that? Your saying the developer was wrong? I have hundreds of hours into both too, point?
