Why doesnt Sony charge for PSN membership?

[room414]

J_Allard said:

room414 said:

99.999%? lol, you pulled that right out of your ass. Fact is, there are a lot of gamers who play little to no multiplayer at all and for them xbl is an especially bad deal. 

I've been a ps+ subscriber for over three years now because it has awesome value and with the ps4 it's only gotten better. I now get 2 ps4 games every month on top of the 3 ps3 games i already get for no additional cost. $3.33 a month. I'm not even planning to get a ps4 anytime soon but i can bank the games and when/if i do get one i'll have a library of games waiting for me. Crazy good deal. Including multiplayer in ps+ changes nothing. 

As someone who only occasionally plays multiplayer on consoles i would never pay for the xbl model. I'd essentially be paying an extra fee to watch netflix. Shitty deal. 

Explain to me how it's hypocritical to have an opposing opinion about two very different things. Try and put the bullshit console war stuff aside for a moment and use a little common sense. 

Sounds like you're one of the .001%. Cool beans. And LOL @ online premium meaning nothing. No point in replying any further to that nonsense, toodles.

Yes, of course i'm the .001%. lol  I'd be paying for ps+ regardless so whether multiplayer is outside or inside of that it makes no difference.

I told you it was an argument you couldn't win.