MessiaH said:
I don't think we need to be grateful for MS or Sony for supporting their consoles for over 8 years. Both companies came out and publicly stated that their consoles have a 10-year life span. If they are stating that, then they had better buckle up and support it for 10 years straight and not a day less. No, I am not saying MS is not supporting it - and I am sure they would throw a few more exclusives to the 360 had they had a more robust first party - but their first party is indeed far smaller than the competition (both Sony and Nintendo) and so they have shifted them to develop software for X1. Is the 360 a good product? Sure. Is the PS3 currently better for the additional support - I would say so. |
SIr, you are being too reasonable, that isn't allowed here.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







