By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarthVolod said:
reggin_bolas said:

I'm talking about the 360, I'm so pissed and I feel neglected by MS. Look at what the PS3 has had this year: Beyond (even though it sucked), Last of Us, Ni No Kuni, Tales of Xilia, Dragon's Crown, Puppeteer  etc, etc.

Where are the exclusives on the 360? GoW Judgment doesn't really count; it was pretty mediocre. Besides Halo 4, there hasn't been a solid exclusive for the 360 in years. The last memorable one was Alan Wake and that was many years ago.

Does anyone else feel really robbed? Why did MS just give up? They didn't even bother keeping some exclusives truly exclusive like Bioshock, Mass Effect, real system sellers. Instead they wasted all their money on timed DLC for shooters and sports games. Truly amazing, and the sole reason I'm getting a PS4 and not an XB1

 


Keep in mind that 360 has been on the market a full year longer than PS3 so we can't make as direct a comparison until we see the PS3 lineup for this time next year ...

360 had Gears, low budget titles like Dark and Deadfall (coming soon I think?), and some XBLA games.

PS3 had God of War and Last of Us as the big titles (Beyond was a flop like you said), some JRPG games (if that is your thing it is not mine), and some low budget titles that were mostly overlooked (Puppeteer and Dragon's Crown).

Not that wide of a gulf really. This was the year of 3rd party with GTA V leading the pack going forward into holidays now.

For next year 360 will have Fable Anniversary and Titanfall so far ... two pretty big titles so that is not bad for a console as old as the 360. Also, 360 added games with gold for this year to make it somewhat on par with PS Plus ... again, not bad for a console on its way out the door.

It doesn't matter that it is one year older, it matters that you keep supporting for as long as the system is alive... and if we use this excuse, what is the excuse for having less exclusives in total (even counting shovelware)?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."