Too_Talls said: Ok I will not pretend to be a God of technical jargin like some people try to and end up more looking like puppets. From what I understand we have a diference not of reselution but a diference in how the same reselution is achieved. Two words, "native" and "upscaled". Native is being praised because it is somehow more built into the game......or something. But at the end, if no labels of the system they were running on were revealed, It's a good chance we have xbox one fan boys saying the ps4 version looks better and vice versa. What is digital Foundry? more people that can tell me what I'm not seeing? I wil pass on that but thanks for the offer. |
I am absolutely sure it is easy to see the difference between native and upscaled 1080p on a 60" TV.
In the end it all comes down to one thing - PS4 is superior while being much cheaper. The difference in performance is not as big as between Wii U and PS4, but it is there and it is easily noticable in games - there is no arguing about it now. So, since XO is inferior, why pay 100 Euro more for it? Why pay more to get less? And that is actually quite a lot of money. For 100 Euro I can get a year of PS+ and a brand new game, which is gonna give me a lot a gaming. Even if you say that an average Joe won't see the difference between PS4 and XO games (I believe he would see if they were put side by side), I am sure he will see the difference between 400 and 500 Euro/$. If on top of that he hears that XO is inferior - he's gonna pick the better product, even if he doesn't see the difference himself.
Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!
My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/
My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.