Seece said:
Of course I fucking list them, they're a studio MS have bult from the ground up and it disproves your theory, why the hell wouldn't I list them? Whether they put out an amazing game or not is anothet topic, I'm disputing what you said. |
you having to put Dakota, big park, Victoria and Redmond pretty much shows that MS clearly prefers to buy their talent instead of developing it. Sure Turn 10 has proved to be a fantastic studio. and 343 handled their first big game pretty great. but other than that? you list a studio (black tusk) that has no game under its belt. you seem to take that i mean that MS never created any studios, maybe i should have added said that they very much prefer to buy talent instead of creating it. look at the 360's list of exclusives and tell me what MS prefers to do, buy talent or create it? look at the xbox one exclusive games and answer the same question.
@bolded: when and if it ever shows, then come talk to me if i say this, but until then you have no legs to stand on. naming a dev that made kinect joy ride and another that made kinect star wars certainly dont help you out.








