Aerys said:
Actually the "resolution importance" problem is just a formulation to hide the real problem, that is the fact that Microsoft is selling a 100$ more console that is widely less powerful than its direct competitor..
Alright so resolution doesn't matter. What's the excuse going to be when we get multiplats with worse lighting, draw distance, textures, AA, framerate and/or object detail on xbox one? None of that matters either?
|
Because nothing graphics related matters its just the gameplay... we just upgrade generations so PS can have a bigger number.
Now on the serious side, yes I believe gameplay is most important, but if it can be better looking I preffer like that.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







