pokoko said:
Seece said:
bananaking21 said:
Seece said:
bananaking21 said:
well microsoft have shown quite clearly that they buy talent instead of creating or developing it. over 10 years in the industry and their first party lineup is by far the worse of the big three. |
Turn 10, 343, Black Tusk, Dakota, Big Park, Good Science, Victoria and Redmond all say differently. MS prefer to cultivate their own studios and will only buy studios they have good relationships with and want to be bought.
|
Black Tusk havent even made a game yet and you list them? what a joke. MS's first party offers on the 360 paint a clear picture of how strong their first party dev line up is. compare those to sonys and nintendos and you will be in a very big surprise if you think MS is on par with sony and nintendo
|
Of course I fucking list them, they're a studio MS have bult from the ground up and it disproves your theory, why the hell wouldn't I list them? Whether they put out an amazing game or not is anothet topic, I'm disputing what you said.
I didn't say MS is on par with Sony or Nintendo, where did I say that?
MS have done a lot of ground work these past 3 years and it'll show on Xbox One.
|
That doesn't make any sense. He's talking about quality. You can't judge the quality of a studio that has never made a game. If you want to say, "wait and see before judging," that would be different.
On topic, I dislike the practice of buying exclusive rights to a game that was going to be multi-plat. However, partnering with a studio from the start, like Nintendo did to create W101, is a good thing.
|
I don't see anywhere him talking about quality?? Which is entirely subjective anyway, it's not like MS put out unplayable shit. Black Tusk has a lot of talent there, they're not gonna put out a 60 metacritic rated game ...
