Scoobes said:
crissindahouse said:
bananaking21 said:
Seece said:
Madword said:
Seece said: OP looks fake, majority of games this gen have been 720p and they have looked fine, as does the Xbox launch line up. |
I think the big issue is that a static image doesnt necessarily translate to a moving image... well thats what I guess... i have no idea really...lol
|
Eh, I'd just disregard everything in the OP tbh.
|
i'd advise him to disregard you.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/10/10/battlefield-4-on-ps4-and-xbox-one-how-it-should-look-at-900p-and-720p-part-2-the-differences/
here is a link showing many, many examples. do you have any proof that this "looks fake" other than your bias? if you are going to call out the OP in 2 post, atleast be able to back your claims up as you certainly lost all your credibility in this thread with your previous posts.
other examples, i engourage the auther to put them in the OP.
same order -720p - 900p - 1080p
pic pic pic
|
that's all fine but if you use the full screenshots and let people watch them on their tv, i think many won't really see a difference.
|
Really? Using those shots the difference is pretty obvious from 720P to 1080P.
I don't understand how anyone could not see the difference between the two.
|
Cause they are zoomed images and most people play the game as a whole and not stare at a small non imortant part of the game. your not really "playing" a game if thats what your doing. and your eye sight will go bad if that practice keeps up.
Then differnt shades of black is all you would have to compare.