|
gergroy said: Yeah, it looks to easily be more than 40%. At least twice as powerful if you actually look at the performance of the system (i.e. Polygons, resolution, texture, etc.). The forum post ethomaz copied was basically an extended 'teh cell' rant, but on the emotion chip instead. Now, personally, I will admit that I dont know much about this stuff, but when you research it and find all the professional people saying xbox is ahead in all these areas and the only people saying ps2 is ahead are random forum posts... I just have a hard time believing it. |
I did copied the tech info... the * bla * is my comments... you can't find it in anyways.
BTW http://arstechnica.com/features/2000/04/ps2vspc/1/ or http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2000/02/ee/
PS2 CPU was really strong than any PC CPU (Xbox CPU) but a lot. Xbox is inded strong than PS2 but not that huge gap or if you think the PS2-Xbox gap was monstruos then you be surprised because the Xbone-PS4 gap showed in games graphics will be even bigger than what you saw in PS2-Xbox.
Jus make a test...
Compare the best looking Xbox game with God of War II, Shadown of Colossus, Gran Turismo 4, etc... and remember the Xbox was easy to programmer and create games... PS2 was a pain in the ass close or worst than PS3... few deves used the VPUs.
You will see the difference is not that big.
