By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
papamudd said:
SvennoJ said:
Not a single word about carbon dating in that entire piece? I guess that scientific method is just a big lie?

What's next? Mermaids?
http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/mermaids/videos/camera-captures-mermaid-on-diving-vessel.htm
Be very skeptical about what you see on tv.

What does carbon dating have to do with dinosaurs? The half life of carbon14 isn't long enough to date such things


Always a good laugh when people bring up stuff that they have absolutely no idea about. It's been a while since uni but I am sure carbon dating is only useful for up to maybe 80,000 years depending on amount of half-lives or something like that. At this point inaccuracies become a major factor.

Not saying the OP has a valid argument but it is sometimes good to remember that a large percent of what people in the scientific communities laughed at a decade ago are now considered "factual".

Some people love to ridicule another's theory and to be honest there is no harm it that, but the arrogance of people who consider themselves more intelligent than most gives the whole thing a rather bad taste.

So in my opinion the OP is talking nonsense but no there is no need to get all worked up about it.