By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Leadified on 23 October 2013
Edit Thread
OooSnap said:
drkohler said:
OooSnap said:

There are Moche vases in Peruvian museums dating from 70 A.D. to 900 A.D. with dinosaurs on them. There are also azcan textile depicting figures that are dated hundreds of years old.

In the Larco Herrera Museum in Peru there are vases that clearly depict dinosaurs.

Complete and utter bullshit.

Don't you even realise that people can actually check your nonsense by going to the museum and SEE the pottery (which in the Moche's case is mostly erotic in nature). You can actually ask archeologists what your "dinosaurs" really are if you cared. But you just don't want to learn...

Or you could actually see photos of it, two which are posted in the op. But for your convenience I'll post one here.

I don't need to ask an archeologist to know that it is a type of dragon or dinosaur.


Here's a harpie on a piece of artwork from the Middle Ages.

This does not prove harpies exist or have existed at all, of course assuming your stones aren't a total hoax, which considering the creationist agenda behind them, does not build any credibility. But let's be fair and get right to the point. Artwork is questionablr so instead go find some dinosaur fossils and human fossils and/or evidence that they are from the same fossil record. The rules of course is this evidence must be from an unbiased credible peer reviewed source which means no Dr.Dennis Swift or any creationist "scientists". No quote mining and you would have to explain your quotes instead of just a copy and paste. If you do not think these rules are fair, that's fine, but it sure doesn't help your case.