| Drakester said: Didnt you play BF3, its nothing like COD. In fact COD is trying to be more like BF with slightly destructable maps and class systems. Cod is dying while BF is thriving |
Yes I did, on my PC. Battlefield 4 doesn't have local multiplayer though. Which again, is why I'm getting call of duty instead, despite battlefield lately appealing more to me.
@OdinHades Getting Killzone too, but very sad that it doesn't have local multiplayer aswell. It would be even more exceptional since that game supports bots. Just the thought of 4 player local multiplayer in shadowfall seems amazing. I'm very sad it's not something the developer is looking at implementing. They are hardly the only ones, but it severly hampers the enjoyment I'll get out of the game. Hopefully in a sequel, though I remain doubtful (since even kz3 had fairly limited local multiplayer)
I really was hoping for a battlefield 2143 though :P But yeah, the whole buying the game twice that everyone want's you to do lately seems a bit over the top. I'll take a good old expansion pack over DLC any day :P (although you can argue that bf premium is that. But being more expensive than the game itself is kinda iffy)
I should note this is for my PS4 that I'm getting at launch. I have a bunch of local multiplayer games for my ps3, but it's not really the same to invite friends over to check out the new machine and watch me play or whatever :P
@NiKKoM.. Sure seems like a lot of developers think that.
For games like bioshock it's totally fine. Story based games.. I get it. But multiplayer ? Why not. it's resource taxing, but you can tone down the effects when playing in local mp, and will probably render at much lower rez for every player regardless.. And even fewer games allows you to take your local friends online (about 3 games for ps3)
Check out my game about moles ^
