| OooSnap said:
You may think I am asking for too much but am I really if evolution is supposedly scientific? The scientific method is based on observable, empirical evidence among other things. Indeed empiricism (an basis in experiment) is what gives science its credibility. Showing empirical evidence of some repitilian species evolving feathers or wings, or a land mammal species evolving a blow hole, or a culture of prokaryotes evolving eyes or limbs. If you can't show any empirical evidence then it falls short of the scientific method. Simple as that. Evolution proponents are good at giving just-so stories but not actually producing hard science. |
Evolution happens over millions of years. The only way it is truly observable is through fossil records (hard science), which very clearly shows evolution to be real. We cannot directly observe it happening (which seems to be your hypocritical criteria for reality), because we don't live for millions of years. However, I get the feeling that you have a lot of 'truths' in your life that are not 'observable' in any fashion whatsoever.







