By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Dark_Feanor said:
CGI-Quality said:

You're the only one I really hear arguing the power differences, bud. They exist, and it's not just for some e-peen war either. Besides, I didn't ask about the ESRAM, in conjunction to PS4, I wanted to know what's so wrong with its inclusion in the X1.


Again, my friend. The real power difference is in the GPU only, periode. The rest is almost the same, or even more advanced in the X1.

False, again. But, for the last time, I didn't need a comparison to the PS4. You could have explained ESRAM without even bringing it up.

 

Jesus, ESRAM is just a buffer, a cache, there is nothing special about it. It can read and write at the same time in each of the 4 chunks thus the "theoretical" an much discredited (by gafers) 264 GB/s bandwidth. It´s there because MS need bandwidth and wanted a low energy consumption and still have a big DDR3 memory poll, for many OS features.

There is nothing in the hardware alone that could explain this gargantuan gap (if its true), 720p is basically current gen.