| OooSnap said: Of course, evolution is anything what evolutinionists want it to be as long it keeps their fairytale going. Answer this question. Did evolutionists expect "living fossils" and amber fossils to have evolve, Yes or no? Did supposed millions of years of stasis contradict the evolutionists' predictions, yes or no? If you answered No, then you need to take it up with the evolutionists I quoted.
|
If the conditions in which the species lived didn´t change over the years and it is already highly specialised...No, it wont change ! Mutations are the basis of Evolution, random errors in the DNA that may cause nothing at all....or something big.
When an single individual in a see of other individuals gains a special positive characteristic through a mutation, it is more likely that this single individual will survive and reproduce more often than the other animals without the new characteristic, the children of the mutant will give the special characteristic to their own children (which themself will have an advantage over the other animals)
...when a mutation has a negative effect, the opposite happens: The individual is less likely to survive/ give it´s DNA to the next generation
If a species is already highly specialised to certain condiditions and it´s ecological niche isn´t changed over the course of 500 million years it won´t evolve
No, this is no condradiction, living fossils are evidence in favour of the evolution theorie (survival of those who fit the best)
