Alby_da_Wolf on 21 October 2013
Some are poor gamers, some are good, most are average ones, but the average is perceived as poorer than in the past because now they have a lot less time to play a game and write a review than in the past, when paper magazines were bigger than now and they had a whole month between each issue. Low average scores, though, don't mean a gaming journalist is bad, actually just the opposite. A gaming journalist MUST be strict and even harsh, otherwise maybe fanboys will be pleased, but all the other gamers will be pissed off if a review too generous made them buy a bad game or simply one they don't like.
