| OooSnap said:
I know scientists can't reproduce macroevolution. That's why it isn't hard science because of lack of observational data. There are no transitional fossils according to scientists: |
You spread more misinformation than a politician
1. Microevolution and Macroevolution describe identical processes, the only difference is time. Pretty sure I addressed this a few times already if you would take a moment and read the responses to you instead of abandoning your arguments each time and running off to form new ones.
2. There are transitional fossils, especially for human ancestry because it's very recent. If you aren't aware of the hominid fossils, you should probably just leave immediately.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo
Fossil record being incomplete is expected. Suggesting otherwise is to admit a very profound ignorance on why any fossils exist in the first place.
But as I've said before, the bulk of the evidence isn't in fossils. Fossils are for laymen.
