By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninjablade on 19 October 2013
Edit Thread
Luck said:
Mythmaker1 said:
Luck said:

Exactly.

Gamespot's review is even worse as the reviewer also tries to demonstrate the idea that the game is difficult by showing clips where he intentionally die (or maybe he's just extremely bad at the game, not sure).

The game is most likely not great, but that Gamespot's review is really a joke, I can't believe one of the biggest site in the industry can be so unprofessionnal. 

The day I ceased to perceive video game media reviews as credible sources.

"Unprofessional?"

How So?

It's either one of those two reasons (only the reviewer knows the truth as he made the review):

1) Showing clips where he intentionally dies to falsely prove his stance that the game is too difficult (It could be too difficult, but why not really show why?)

2) Letting a reviewer who is either a) incapable of playing the game at a skill level achieved by 95% of the players who showed their playthrough or b) simply didn't spend nearly enough time playing the game before reviewing it (hence how much he sucks).

And for those who say ''How dare people defend this game'': for me at least, it's not about defending the game or trying to prove that it's good, the problem here is that some reviewers clearly did an extremely poor or dishonest work of reviewing this game.

its just not some reviewers the majority of reviews are below 7s, lots of them are 5 and below, reviwers are not digging the game and the controls, how is that being dishonest. 

http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii/sonic-colors/critic-reviews take a look at sonic colors reviews, this has nothing to do with being dishonest, sonic colors actually almost got to 80