By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zarx said:
JEMC said:
So based on those limited benchmarks, the 290X is between 10 and 15% faster than a 780.

I can't wait to see the whole reviews... and know the price!


At 4K (which requires a lot of memory bandwidth so the 512-bit bus on the 290X is shown off) with the games that AMD wanted shown anyway. On the other hand they are probably running on early drivers so there may be some more performance as drivers mature for the new cards (not that they are much different from their current ones).

 

True.

I checked pbroy's thread where CGI has posted Anand's numbers, only for Bioshock

From Medium to Very High there's a drop of 10fps on both cards.

Do you know where to find Titan and 7970/280X numbers at that res? Over at Anand I could only find up to 5760x1200 (which is almost 1.4 million less pixels) on Ultra, numbers are 35.3 for the 7970 GHz and 46.7 for the Titan.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.