Whitefire said:
Natural selection is about inheriting traits. Which is different of what I am trying to say. All of the links you gave me haven't shown me proof of Dawinian Evolution. Which is an animal turning into another animal. These Lizards are still lizards, and the moths are still moths, just different. Which is how we get different species, which is what creationsists believe. What creationsists don't believe is that those lizards won't become birds anytime soon.
Like I said true Evolution won't be proven anytime soon, if ever. |
Natural selection is vital to evolution. This is in stark contrast to "God creates each and every human" as is the case with creationists.
They are all wonderful examples of evolution. You've demonstrated that you simply don't know what evolution is.
"Lizards are still lizards, moths are still moths" - this is hilarious stuff. Primates are still primates. Can apes procreate with chimps? Can bonobos procreate with chimps? Can humans procreate with apes?
If they can't they are an entirely different species. You realize lizard is an overarching group, yes? There are many different species of lizard.
Another fundamental error - micro evolution leads to macro evolution. When enough micro evolution occurs making the new group unable to procreate with its ancestral group, that's when you have a new species.
So by admitting microevolution, you admit macroevolution and evolution itself. Game Over.
