dsgrue3 said:
Whitefire said:
dsgrue3 said:
You didn't list any fallacies, just repeatedly claimed I used them. Sorry sport, that isn't how things work.
Alright it's clear you're totally ignorant on the topic. Fossils are totally unnecessary to the theory of evolution. We don't even need them to establish sufficiently that it occurred. It's also laughable that you suggest the entire collection of fossils is fake.
Evolutionary biologists can test their theories. Any new fossils found are an opportunity to test them. If any fossil is found from the wrong era, that would really put a substantial dagger in evolutionary theory. Furthmore, artificial selection is principled from natural selection (an evolutionary construct) for crops and breeding of animals.
Yes, because you know better than the doctor about ADHD right? You called them out based upon total ignorance.
I never said you had a pet. I never made any claims, I asked questions. Maybe understand the difference, okay?
I never said not to challenge authority, I said the authority is in a better position than laymen to form judgements because they have credibility on such topics.
Your position seems to be that you know everything. Hilarious stuff.
|
Natural Selection isn't evolution. And the fossil record has done little for evolution. Of course Evolution will never be proven, because no one will ever be alive to see one type of animal evolve into another. So all scientists can do it make the best of what they have. Which is why it is weird that evolutionists nag creationists for the same thing.
|
Natural Selection isn't part of evolution? Go back to school.
Fossil record isn't needed, like I've said several times in this thread. It simply is an easy way to demonstrate similarities between creatures without a degree in genetics/biology.
Creationists have 0 positive evidence. That's why no one takes them seriously. You do understand that, right?
Examples of evolution happening:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli_long-term_evolution_experiment
Start reading.
|
Natural selection is about inheriting traits. Which is different of what I am trying to say. All of the links you gave me haven't shown me proof of Dawinian Evolution. Which is an animal turning into another animal. These Lizards are still lizards, and the moths are still moths, just different. Which is how we get different species, which is what creationsists believe. What creationsists don't believe is that those lizards won't become birds anytime soon.
Like I said true Evolution won't be proven anytime soon, if ever.
