| Jandre002 said: I was honestly going to butcher this guy, but its not even worth it. Facts friend. Theres nothing in there. Just because you say a console is more innovative doesn't mean it is. Past the Wii-mote, whats so innovative about the Wii? Its not gamers buying the Wii, its casuals first off. The Wii isn't beating the PS3/360 directly, its just going to another source. XboxLive? Are you serious? The ability to send messages in game make in innovative? Or is it achievements. Other than that, what are you talking about? Graphics? NO. Game scale?NO. Its easier to make games on, MSFT pays for exclusives. THAT SIMPLE. The 360 does NOTHING the PS3 can't do.
|
You fail at butchering.
"Past the Wii-mote?" Why do we have to look past the greatest innovation since Sony brought in CD's? The Wii is being bought by millions of gamers for SMG and Brawl, as well as expanding the market. Thats called two things:
Expanding the market.
Kicking 360/PS3's ass.
And Xbox Live certainly is innovative. Microsoft did it first and Microsoft did it best. Many people on THESE forums say the buy 360 versions of games for achievements. Since Sony came out with the genuinly bad PSN they had at launch, Sony fanboys have been saying "it does, nothing the PS3 can't do," but when is the PS3 going to get up and prove it Jandre?
It's just like people saying that Blu-Ray is necessary for gaming, when not a single multi-platform game has been cut-down for the 360. When is the PS3 going to get up and prove it?
As a side note, if you think Sony didn't end up handing Konami a fat wad of cash for MGS4 timed-exclusivity, your deluded.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
