alpha_dk said:
"Sony's advantage", of course, being catering to reviewers. I think that we can say that reviewers are somewhat worthless when it comes to reviews of these games; they may be very fun, but because the reviewers shy away from those types of games, and towards FPS or whatever you want to say their bias is towards... well, I would say that Sony might wanna start thinking about what types of games might *not* be reviewed well, if they want to tap into this market at all. The Blue Ocean will not be broken into by a game that scores 90+ on metacritic... metacritic is a gauge of how much the red ocean likes the game. Keep that in mind whenever talking about review scores. And I would just like to take this opportunity to point out... I have had a hell of a lot more fun with the 72% Endless Ocean than I ever will with the 86% Resistance: Fall of Man. |
i think sony caters to it's audience. it's audience is made up of gamers. there's nothing wrong with that. besides, no one ever said nintendo was bad. from a publishing standpoint it just averaged slightly lower then sony in 07. no big deal.
