AstroGamer said:
dsgrue3 said:
You should attack yourself man, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Evidence in peer-reviewed journals, not internet blogs. If you don't understand the difference, then go back to school.
Ever been to a museum? Tons of evidence there too.
You have to be blind not to see the evidence. It's like you are actively avoiding anything which contradicts you perception of the world, which shows you simply aren't interested in truth.
|
There you go again presuming that I believe evolution is completely wrong, no I don't. But when I said articles, I implied peer-reviewed journals and they are the most conclusive proof for godless evolution. However, it is simply because they are scientists that you believe them. You would probably dismiss most evidence of God as most of it is done by theologists. I'm just saying have a shred of doubt if you don't have physical evidence. I'm also pretty sure that the evidence in museums doesn't disprove my concept of the origin of life.
|
Okay, I can see you're struggling with this concept.
Do you go to a Burger King worker for science information? Do you go to a Priest for medical information?
You go to the experts in their respective fields for such information. If I want to find scientific evidence for something, I go to the experts of science. If I want to find philosophical evidence for something, I go to philosophers. If I have a health complication, I visit a doctor.
What's your problem wtih science?
EDIT:
Physical evidence - fossils and DNA. These are physical things. The entire human genome is sequenced and compared to other animal AND plant life.
Ah, there you go with origin. Evolution isn't about origin, sir. You show a fundamental ignorance again. It's about diversification of species from the first life form forward. It makes no attempt to say how life originated.
