kupomogli said:
Most fans hated the remake because it was different. I'm one of them. That is, until I actually played it. I watched a friend play it through the full game and I've played through about half of it myself as I don't own it yet, but for the time I've spent with it, it could possibly be better than any Capcom developed DMC games. As for the character models and story, after people stop letting bias about the original series get in the way and take it as a new take then they'll probably like the new Dante and Vergil just as much as the old ones. Vergil's doesn't look as cool as he did on DMC3, but he's still just as badass. If you're not going to play the game or don't mind a spoiler watch the ending. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXaz6XczZNI I'd rather have a new DmC from Ninja Theory than a new DMC. Similar to DmC reboot, I'm also a huge Castlevania fan. I'm just as much a Castlevania fan as I am a Final Fantasy fan. I hated Lords of Shadow before playing it because it went against the timeline that has already been set up prior to release. Once I gave it a chance and took it as Lords of Shadow and not Castlevania, it's such a good game that it's my favorite this gen. If I letmy bias about it not being Castlevania continue getting in the way, I would have missed out on such an amazing game. |
I've already watched the whole game after playing a few hours of it and not caring to play the rest. For me and my brother (who played the entire game), it was too much of a Matrix ripoff and the combat took less skill than the previous games. There wasn't anything wrong with the past games as far as DMC fans were concerned, so there wasn't any need to redo the origin story, and this is why imo it didn't do as well as the old games.
I am the Playstation Avenger.
|
|
