Puppyroach said:
What are you talking about? Of course the history is completely irrelevant when looking at the profitability of a brand. It is almost an impossibility to not rack up losses when you start a new business segment. The chalenge for MS was even greater since noone before had been succesful in a three-way race in the console business. What you need to look at is how this investment has payed of, which shows they have had 6 straight years of profit. If they continue on this path, the E&D department will only add brand awareness and hard cash to MS as a whole. The trend is actually really positive at the moment. |
You are contradicting yourself: Of course the history is completely irrelevant when looking at the profitability of a brand
they have had 6 straight years of profit [...] The trend is actually really positive at the moment.
To have a trend you need to have a history - so it ISN'T irrelevent to look at MS's history in console gaming. The history is PART of the trend going forward. Yes, Xbox is making money now, but from what I've seen the brand as a whole has lost more money than its made, and that's something to remember because it's important for the brand to generate money from the get go with the Xbone - MS has said so themselves.
Investors won't be interested in Xbox if it doesn't recover the losses sustained from the past 12 years. True, they're having a positive trend earning tons of cash, but that's also a trend they have to keep alive.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.







