By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 said:
AstroGamer said:
Now that I think about it more, there is not exactly a huge difference between devout believers of creationism and evolution. They just both require faith. One requires faith in an ancient book and the other requires faith in that scientists are not bullshitting you. Simply because it is reported by a scientist or experts, many people will just believe. Heck, if a bunch of scientists decided to announce that ingesting mercury will give you stronger muscles with a bunch of seemingly realistic figures, there is not many who wouldn't believe them. I'm sure scientists fudge their numbers a little all the time. I'm not saying that you shouldn't believe in anything, I'm just saying do not take any source for an absolute truth

Religious faith is belief without evidence. I've heard people call it "evidence in things unseen." 

Evolution is built upon a mountain of evidence. Maybe review my previous post to you about it - you don't have to take anyone's word for it. Just go review the evidence yourself - not hard.

Hilarious quip at the end - that's exactly what theists do...take their holy book as absolute truth. Your hypocrisy is profound, sir.

Please stop speaking from total ignorance on matters you clearly can't fathom.


Mountains of evidence that you have never seen aside from articles dude. Also, its my point that theists and atheists in general do take things at face value without making sure. The smart person can make a doubt. Also, look at you immediately getting on the defensive despite me not attacking atheists but rather ignorant people.



My Hummingbird

3DS Friend Code: 047387541842