dsgrue3 on 15 October 2013
| AstroGamer said: Now that I think about it more, there is not exactly a huge difference between devout believers of creationism and evolution. They just both require faith. One requires faith in an ancient book and the other requires faith in that scientists are not bullshitting you. Simply because it is reported by a scientist or experts, many people will just believe. Heck, if a bunch of scientists decided to announce that ingesting mercury will give you stronger muscles with a bunch of seemingly realistic figures, there is not many who wouldn't believe them. I'm sure scientists fudge their numbers a little all the time. I'm not saying that you shouldn't believe in anything, I'm just saying do not take any source for an absolute truth |
Religious faith is belief without evidence. I've heard people call it "evidence in things unseen."
Evolution is built upon a mountain of evidence. Maybe review my previous post to you about it - you don't have to take anyone's word for it. Just go review the evidence yourself - not hard.
Hilarious quip at the end - that's exactly what theists do...take their holy book as absolute truth. Your hypocrisy is profound, sir.
Please stop speaking from total ignorance on matters you clearly can't fathom.
