| AstroGamer said: The problem is that evolution and creationism don't really conflict. The poll probably wasn't worded the best as I doubt a significant portion of Americans take Genesis at face value. I'm personally moreso in the first option. There's also a bunch of fallacies within evolutionary theory such of a significant lack of intermediate species in the fossil record which don't make evolution the absolute most correct option. I guess the issue is do you agree with the one that can be proven but has some fallacies or taking the one that has very little evidence but also not many fallacies. |
It speaks for itself man, 46% of people in the US take Genesis literally.
Your bewilderment is not an argument against the fact placed in front of you.
You don't seem to know much about the evidence for evolution because you point to fossils, which aren't even necessary. They are nice for the layman because they are visual, but without any fossils at all the theory has all the evidence it needs in DNA.
Do you realize we're lucky to have any fossils at all? To expect a perfect record of intermediate states it completely asinine. If you want a collection of intermediate fossils go here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html
There are no fallacies in evolution. I challenge you to name any. And lack of fossil evidence isn't a fallacy anymore than lack of god evidence is a fallacy.
