dsgrue3 said:
Kane1389 said:
dsgrue3 said:
Kane1389 said:
I actually am using scholary sources. I even gave you a link to Tactius's hisotry ffs! I wonder why you ignored them. Probably just to have the last reply.
I have no problem with someone using youtube videos as a source for their claims as long as they are academic and/or scholary and not selective quotiong, ad hominem, casuality denying neck beards yelling at the camera.
|
You seem thoroughly confused about what a scholarly source is. You should look up the definition here. Hint: None of what you quoted would be considered a scholarly source. (Surprise!)
Why did you give me a wiki link to Tacitus? You seem very confused here again as I haven't spoken to you about the topic, simply mocked your obvious hypocrisy.
Do keep up, will you?
|
You...you havent actually read any of the links i posted, did you? You just read the URL link and concluded from the name of the websites that they dont contain any scholary sources did you?
|
I don't need to watch a youtube video or a blog to know it isn't a peer-reviewed journal by academic peers. (Apparently you chose the route of ignorance, despite my providing a link to a defintion for you.)
This is just basic reasoning ability.
Stop for a moment, go back and read who was actually listening to your arguments and offering their own...and then punch yourself in the face because it wasn't me. I've made no argument with you at all.
Like I said already, you seem thoroughly confused.
|
Ok, so you wont bother standing up by your false statements, thats good.
Why did you even quote me then? Did you do it just for the sake of berating me? I mean I know you have a hisotry of being very bitter and hostile towards anyone with different opinion, but usually you come up with some sort of argument to go with it.
