By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Smidlee on 04 March 2008
Edit Thread
L.C.E.C. said:
naznatips said:
Riot Of The Blood said:
L.C.E.C. said:
Graphics definitely deserved a 9+ (9.5 IMO), but still, a good score I suppose.

That's way to high. 9.5 is Killzone 2 or Gran Turismo 5 graphics. 8.5 is a great score for this games graphics.


That's ridiculous. You don't compare graphics to other platforms. You compare them to the other games on the platform in question. Otherwise DS graphics would never score above a 3, and PS3 and 360 graphics would never score above an 8 after Crysis.


I was agreeing with what Naznatips was saying. That's exactly what I was trying to say.

The only time you compare graphics between consoles is like with the PS3 & 360 ports of the PC game F.E.A.R.

 

Then why should the wii get a pass when it comes to graphics? (PC are often compared on better hardware than consoles) Is the Wii this generation game system or last?

If wii is surposed to be this generation console then it's graphics should be rated according to this generation and not last. (melee,ps2) I have surely seen a wii game get a higher rating because of it's controller.