By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tastyshovelware on 04 March 2008
Edit Thread
naznatips said:
tastyshovelware said:
naznatips said:
Riot Of The Blood said:
L.C.E.C. said:
Graphics definitely deserved a 9+ (9.5 IMO), but still, a good score I suppose.

That's way to high. 9.5 is Killzone 2 or Gran Turismo 5 graphics. 8.5 is a great score for this games graphics.


That's ridiculous. You don't compare graphics to other platforms. You compare them to the other games on the platform in question. Otherwise DS graphics would never score above a 3, and PS3 and 360 graphics would never score above an 8 after Crysis.


a lot of people are comparing melee's graphics to brawl. last time i checked, they were on different platforms. the 8.5 is fine (if maybe a tad low).


Ugh, this is childish.

People are comparing sequels across generation to show system improvement. That's not the same as comparing Wii to PS3 graphics or DS to PC graphics. Each system has its own capabilities and should be judged within its own merits, not within the merits of others. If you are going to compare previous generation games to Wii games to show improvement that's fine, but clearly there is a vast improvement in all technical aspects from Melee to Brawl.


I have no problem with that. i just think it's silly that people are posting melee pictures (2001 gamecube game) next to brawl pictures (2008 wii game) and saying "wow, what a leap. 10!"