By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 said:
Kane1389 said:
dsgrue3 said:

The irony of criticizing someone's knowledge based upon youtube and then using that same medium to  present your rebuttal is truly astounding. Wordpress is even more baffling.

Anyways, reported for "queer" surely you know that isn't appropriate.

Except that this isnt your AmazingAtheist or Thunderf00t or FuckG0d or any other of your man child neckbeards basement dwellers. Rather the evidence comes from actual scholars and proffesors who know much more about the subject than you and I. And i only used 2 youtube videos, you're stretching there a bit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ

Now you're defending your hypocrisy? Stop embarrassing yourself. YouTube personalities are exactly that, those people exist to counter the other neckbeards like VenomFangX. I don't get any of my scholarly information from YouTube, unless it's a TEDtalks or video of an actual expert lecturing or debating.

Yeah 1/3 of your sources were Youtube, no stretching necessary lmfao. And I noticed you didn't even bother addressing wordpress BLOGS.

All the while professing to be using scholarly sources...wow, I can't believe you typed that with a straight face. 

I actually am using scholary sources. I even gave you a link to Tactius's hisotry ffs! I wonder why you ignored them. Probably just to have the last reply.

I have no problem with someone using youtube videos as a source for their claims as long as they are academic and/or scholary and not selective quotiong, ad hominem, casuality denying neck beards yelling at the camera.