fatslob-:O said:
Pemalite said:
fatslob-:O said:
Are you talking about effective clocks ? The actual clock would be 1375. By god I hate the term "effective clock" since that shit originated from nvidia. :P
Another question, what is the effect of bigger bus on the heat generated by the DRAM ? (Well y'know PC DRAM runs at a bus width of 64bit.)
|
Yeah I am talking about "effective clocks".
As for heat, it will be Bucklies, most of the extra heat would be generated by the memory controller not the actual DRAM IC's.
|
Your right but wouldn't that make the APU hotter ?
|
Sure, but you could also drop the 1.6~ Billion transisters for the eSRAM because it wouldn't be required. :P
Whether they would break even in heat and powerconsumption and cost, I would actually have no clue, not many people in the world would as we have no idea on the APU's costs.