By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
Pemalite said:
fatslob-:O said:

Are you talking about effective clocks ? The actual clock would be 1375. By god I hate the term "effective clock" since that shit originated from nvidia. :P

Another question, what is the effect of bigger bus on the heat generated by the DRAM ? (Well y'know PC DRAM runs at a bus width of 64bit.) 


Yeah I am talking about "effective clocks".

As for heat, it will  be Bucklies, most of the extra heat would be generated by the memory controller not the actual DRAM IC's.

Your right but wouldn't that make the APU hotter ? 


Sure, but you could also drop the 1.6~ Billion transisters for the eSRAM because it wouldn't be required. :P
Whether they would break even in heat and powerconsumption and cost, I would actually have no clue, not many people in the world would as we have no idea on the APU's costs.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--