By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Astrodust said:
Kasz216 said:
senseinobaka said:
@Kasz

The economic havoc levied against the US and UK are not meant to be solutions. They are an example of how some politico desire to use the mass hysteria to push a very political agenda

That's what i'm saying. That's a reason why people would "make up" global warming.

There is plenty of money to be made in anti-global warming legislature. So both sides would have reasons to fabricate data.


There is much more money to be made for people against global warming. Global warming is about recycling, using less energy, wasting less stuff. Who stands to lose the most if we start driving less or use less electricity. Not the people championing global warming. But then, people love to consume as much as they can and don't want to be told they shouldn't.


Ah, you'd be surprised how much money can be made in setting up recycling standards and how much "new" money their is in green energy. Unlike Oil, it's an open field, that anyone who has enough money for investment can make a killing with the right lobbying... with government approval anyway. (kickbacks)

Even if we did pass global warming people wouldn't consume less. Instead we'd keep taxing people until they consumed less via a carbon tax. Which maens a lot more money for the government.

Global Warming is big buisness for the government.