kowenicki said:
phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
its a good move, for micorsoft, not for me, I dont want the dam camera, if i want a xbone im being forced to buy the perhiperal.......I would never! use it so as the consumer its not giving me personally any benifit, for those who want it, yes its great |
Its not a Peripheral if its part of Xbox One.
Same way Wii Nunchuck wasnt a peripheral.
Its cool if you dont want to by into Xbox One ( everyone forgets its called One because its trying to be more than a games machine ).
But Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One.
|
do i need that camera to play gta/call of duty? in what way does that benifit me playing those games, its doesnt, it isnt needed, its a perhiperal, if i was into games that involved a camera, or i wanted to skypre, then sure id need it and then go buy the perhiperal (optionally).....but I dont want/need it, so why do i have to purchase the console at a higer price because they want me to have it, its not a nessecity
|
What logic is that?
Do you need Wii Nunchuck to play or Wii U tablet to play Mass Effect 3, Batman, etc etc. If I wanted to play touch or wave gaming Id have bought it for my Wii/ Wii U seperately.
See the logic here?
A peripheral is an after thought idea which is an add on.
Xbox One is as it is. Kinect 2.0 is not an add on and not a peripheral.
Xbox One is not Xbox 360 or PS3.
|
and thats why they have lost a sale from me, aaaaand many others
|
Which franchises that you played on your 360 will you miss on the ONE?
|
left 4 dead.....2 in particular
