WiiBox3 said:
What about the current Kinect or the PS Eye? As for the advertising patent, companies apply for patents all of the time. Most patents are never used. If they started charging for PPV this way, people would unplug the XBO and find another way to watch the content. |
Yeah Im not really doing a comparison with other technologies. Any camera in your house with a network connected to it could do something similar. I dont have a Gen 1 Kinect (do have a 360), nor a PSEye (do have a PS3). Im not a tin-foil hat type of guy and generally dont have a lot to hide from, but I do get annoyed by advertising. Some people can watch TV for a few hours watching 15-20 minutes of commercials an hour w/o hesistating, but I find it annoying. You're right about the patent and unconnecting Kinect if its going to count people watching.
I guess it all comes down to how tastefully its done. If the data never leaves your xbox, thats at least sounds nice. Someone will surely span a network port and run wireshark on the mirrored port to see what gets transmitted back to MS. If they default the advertising to OFF and turn data collection submittal to OFF by default then thats a step in the right direction. If its all turned on, they're betting on folks not paying attention (and there are a lot of people like that) and they can make some good $$ on the folks that dont realize they're being targeted.
Again, this isnt a Sony vs Microsoft response, its about any company that wants to put a super smart networked camera in your living room.







