| Chris Hu said: In the grand scheme of things its the only thing that matters since that is how both MS and Sony generate their income since both consoles where sold at a loss throughout most of their existance. Also if gamers would value the PS3 more then it would sell more software both physical and digital so you are dead wrong on that one. |
I despise this line of reasoning, because it inherently implies that
Activision's Call of Duty franchise is most praiseworthy
Kinect is praiseworthy
etc.
If you're not some non-gamer businessman that actually deals in stocks, then WHY would profit margins enter into your arguments at all!? No sir, what we have here is a classic case of upholding the few upperhands of your favourite company even though (IN REAL LIFE TERMS) it means NOTHING to you.
NOTHING.
Do you know what matters to me? Having the best software lineup and a (technologically) cutting edge experience. That's all that's ever mattered, which is why I supported the 360 until 2009, but why I've fallen so out of love with that white box under my TV that I hardly even want to look at it.
What you are doing is yo-yo-ing between whatever is convenient and true for your argument at any given time.
