Machiavellian said:
Here is the differece. If you would have stated, this line is incorrect, can you provide proof, then I would be more than happy to do so. Instead you stated I did not know what I was talking about, which gives the impression that you do. Its then up to you to find anything I stated as false. Hell, I have no clue which part that I stated that you consider incorrect since you did not even have the balls to suggest one line. If you cannot prove any statement is false then why don't you pick a line or sentence or paragraph where I am wrong about my claim on Azure. Maybe you can muster up that much effort. As to the bolded part, that was a opinion based on my knowledge of development. Its what people call a Theory. You called out nothing since you did not debate the point. Sometimes I do feel I am talking to 12 year olds who have no clue about debating a point. You either have a different opinion, a revelant point of view or information to support your statements. If not than you contribute nothing. |
First you say I don't have the balls to suggest one line. Then you confirm I did?
I am aware what you said was a theory, assumptions and opinions... not actual facts. And I appreciate you acknowledge now that they are just that... assumptions. I already knew that. I looked for the information to check your statements and when I found none, called you out about it.
You see, I used to disprove peoples statements. But when I did, I never got any results. They simply move on and continue spreading whatever they were spreading.
So now instead of taking time disproving, I simply ask them to prove it. And they can't never prove it because the information isn't out there for them to do that
