insomniac17 on 06 October 2013
| NobleTeam360 said: It goes the same way when he is the reason we lost the game. |
You are missing the point. Without Romo, the Cowboys are not in the game. The interception directly led to the loss, but he is the reason you were in a position to win at all. You can say that if the interception didn't happen, the Cowboys win. You could say that if Rahim Moore hadn't blown coverage against Baltimore in the playoffs, Denver would have won. But that's ignoring all of the other chances to make big plays that also didn't happen. The interception is the most visible play that led to the loss. But don't ignore all of the other ones that the Cowboys didn't make that contributed.
