Machiavellian said:
theprof00 said:
walsufnir said:
So many "technicians" here only talking about stuff they don't know about :) Impressive how agenda makes people to experts while knowing *nothing* about what needs to be in order for a good streaming service. No matter what, MS already has a big cloud service already running. Now. To try out for everyone. This has nothing to do with what they would be able to do with their streaming service but the infrastucture is ready *now*. data centers, serves, contracts with peerings, everything. Now Sony has to show us what they are able to do and I hope it will be 2014. I hope 2014 is also for Europe, everything else would mean they bought a service which was never ready in Europe for masses. |
You don't need to be a technician to know a bullshit statement when you read one.
Other stuff removed for brevity
|
|
I counter that you do need to know the technology before you can call something BS. The big problem is most actually do not know the technology. You are making broad sweeping comments about cloud this and that without understanding how the Cloud actually works or even the type of service used.
|
What are you talking about though?
My statements have nothing to do with Rio. I'm saying you can't judge gaikai just because rio uses 300k servers. My argument is pretty sound as well. Gaikai may have enough to do what it needs to do, and Rio may be geared toward the company as a whole. I'm not saying Rio is bad. I'm saying this is the definition of apples to oranges.
